[Save Data] [ニッチの察知] 性癖討論～Punishment On Stage～ [RJ01188792]

The [Sexuality Discussion] is a one-on-one discussion run by an organization. The underground facility is located at the end of a back alley in a busy downtown area, and was built on a construction site that has been delayed after delay after delay. The underground facility can be visited by ticket system from a small hut. The [sexuality discussion] held at the facility is completely members-only, The members are given the right to watch a wide variety of sexual proclivities and training sessions. The debaters who are nominated to participate in the [Sexuality Debate] do not have the right to refuse to participate, The debaters appointed to the [Sexuality Debate] have no right to refuse to participate, and must discuss their sexual proclivities in accordance with the agenda presented to them. The audience will vote for the contestant who has the most interesting sexual proclivities based on the content of the discussion, The loser is obliged to "stage-manage" the debate. The debater who is obliged to give stage directions loses all human rights forever. They must surrender their bodies and souls to the winner and allow their entire bodies to be played with... The girl "Mariko Kisaragi," who was less than 18 years old at the time, was a member of the "Laughing Hill" group, a group of entrepreneurs. She established a sexuality discussion group in the closed off artificial island of Laughing Hill Academy, and after many sacrifices, she decided to allow students to participate in the discussion, After many sacrifices, she came to rule as the student council president. After graduation, she entrusted the authority of the student council to her younger sister, and after a few years, she became the youngest student president of a huge conglomerate group. After graduation, she entrusted the authority of the student council to her younger sister, and became the youngest person to hold an executive position in a giant zaibatsu group. she hears the news of the "Collapse of Laughing Hill Academy". The person who receives [stage direction] must enjoy the performance of being humiliated in the nude. The debater who loses the sexuality debate will be obliged to receive [stage instruction]. The debaters must be aware that they are serving the stage actor and the winner with their bodies, The dildo is inserted into the deepest part of the vagina, which is opened forcibly, Whether it is a nipple being pulled and twisted with the force of being crushed, Or, to have a foreign object inserted fearlessly into the impure hole in a spinning posture, Or to have the soles of their bare feet fixed at the tips of their toes and tickled endlessly, I have to accept the miserable stimulation with a sense of gratitude. Stage direction is always given, no matter who the subject is. Outline of the work This work is a sequel to "Sexuality Discussion - Smile Harassment Island", 　Please understand that this work is a sequel to "Sexuality Discussion ~Smile Harassment Island~" and contains spoilers from the previous work in the scenario. (1) Genre Slightly Lyonnaise Training Type Real-time Action ADV (2)Intent Climax / Continuous Climax / Tickling / Jogging / Nipple Development / Milking / Anal / Two-Hole Torture / Tentacles / Bondage / Electric Torture / Machine / Clitoris Sucking / etc... (3)CG Basic 16 pictures [+ 1 non-erotic scene] Approx. 380 pictures including difference (4) Creation tool Visual novel tool "Banquet" for Unity and Unity (https://madnesslabo.net/utage/ ) (5) Screen size 1280×720 px (6)System in general Fast forward, sentence auto, quick save & load, message window erase & transparency adjustment, Backlog function, Skip function, Recollection mode, Message speed adjustment Yes (7) Version information -Ver 1.0.0 [Nov. 2, 2024]. Commercial version released (8) About the "Sexuality Discussion System The winner of the discussion is the first participant to score 3 points. The "Argumentation" part, in which participants talk one-on-one with each other. The "Right to Collect Opinions" part, in which opinions are collected from the audience and directed in a favorable direction. Because opinions cross each other in real time during the debate, The key to victory may be to not miss any important lines of dialogues. About the "Claims Argument" part of the system (1) During argumentation, if something is inconvenient for your opponent or if there is something to argue against, you can use the Click to focus on it and be ready to refute it! (2) To display the proposed counterarguments to the dialogue you focused on, Click on the option that you judge to be appropriate for the situation. (If you just deny it in the dark, the situation will become less exciting, so a proposal that says, "That's a good point, but on top of that..." may be easier to convince the audience. (3) If the proposal is not accepted, the viewer loses confidence in the proposal and mentality decreases. When your mental capacity reaches 0, you lose the sexuality debate. (4) If the proposal passes, you can regain the right to speak. Note that focus is also required when digging into your own statements! About the "Right to Collect Considerations" part of the system (1) When you hold a consideration collection right, you will receive a stream of various comments from viewers. Comments that are in line with the agenda should be affirmed without hesitation, while comments that are inconvenient for advancing the agenda should be denied. (2) You can choose to affirm or deny by flicking the target comment to the right of the screen for affirmation or to the left of the screen for denial. You can also scroll back through the comments you missed, so it is one way to spend a full hour worrying about it! (3) Comment in the affirmative or negative. (3) Negation is not a denial of opinion or sexuality itself, but a denial of a participant's preference or disagreement with the agenda. (4) Successful persuasion will give a more favorable impression to the viewer, while failure will give an unfavorable impression. Since the points awarded depend on how many comments you were able to persuade in the end, it is a good idea to pick up the comments well!